The End of Dance is a series of texts that examines endings in dance. It offers a reflective space and platform for people to evaluate, digest and see how things have settled for them. We often see writing and content that focuses on the before, the new and the next - this isn't a space for that. This is somewhere that looks at the aftermaths, the impacts and what happened in those end moments.
This text is different from the other interviews and travelogue in the series, it's a chronological and critical examination of the repetitive priorities, language and policies used by Arts Council England (ACE), the Department for Culture Media and Sport and other Governmental departments over the last 30 years in the pursuit of a coherent dance policy. It pays special attention to notions of excellence, poses questions around the lack of generational policy knowledge within ACE and offers a dance policy for 2026 using only the recycled epitaphs of long dead and erased documents.

A little bit of background about me. After having completed my training in Live Art and experimental theatre at the University of Hull, Scarborough Campus, I went onto perform, direct and initiate a number of performances and mail art projects for the National Review of Live Art, Diskurs Festival and a site specific work for 40 performers in Moldova.
I am the Founder/Editor of the Hip Hop Dance Almanac and Ink Cypher, delivered the first Hip Hop Dance Writing Lab in Hong Kong in April 2025 and directed a new stage work - The Archive of Unbodied Letters - which premiered in Hong Kong in June 2026 .
I am an Organisational Dramaturg, Executive Director, Writer and Archivist and likes to rummage in other fields of thought to bring new combinations of things together. Over the last 10 years I have produced indoor, outdoor, digital work and development programmes in the performing arts in Japan, China, Hong Kong, Singapore, Sri Lanka, India, Thailand and extensively across UK/Europe. End credits.
Introduction
In March 2026 the independent review of Arts Council England (ACE) conducted by Baroness Margaret Hodge was published. The organisational response from ACE coming a few months later offered a raft of new promises:
-
A new strategic framework,
-
A new national portfolio process,
-
A new service for individuals,
-
A new online platform where people can apply for funding and access
The aforementioned 2028-2033 National Portfolio Investment Programme is being shaped through regular testing and feedback from both internal and external users, colleagues across ACE, National and Area Councils members, and Sector Advisory Panels.
These Sector Advisory Panels are currently inputting into and shaping “overviews” for each artform using the Delphi method. Might “overview” be an alternative word for policy or manifesto? Some of the areas which are currently under discussion in the dance “overview” are: the cost of creating and touring dance, career progression, limited access to affordable and appropriate rehearsal and production spaces, the cost of training, the heavy reliance of freelancers and access to dance in education.
Advisory Panels have long been used by ACE; the Dance Advisory Panel in 2001 featured: Professor Christopher Bannerman (Chair), Pushkala Gopal, Jane Hackett, Jeanefer Jean-Charles, Marie McCluskey MBE, Jane Mooney, Maggie Morris, Richard Shaw and…Alistair Spalding.
ACE last published a dance artform policy in 2006. The stated priorities from it for 2007-2011 were:
-
We will fund a portfolio of organisations that are contemporary in their approach and committed to engaging people in their work in new ways. We will continue to review the organisations we fund. We will prioritise those seeking to implement more sustainable business models and to develop partnerships that give their work greater impact and reach.
-
We will support the development of the dance profession. We will work to enhance pathways into the profession and we will promote opportunities for dance artists to develop skills throughout their careers. We will help create the time, space, money and networks that artists and managers need to develop their practice.
-
We will promote collaborations between producers, promoters and dance artists and encourage new forms of distribution for live dance and for digital work. We will work with partners to promote and develop spaces for dance.
-
We will develop the impact of dance in the wider community. We will promote the contribution that dance makes to a healthier society. We will build connections with wider creativity and physical activity agendas. We will provide advocacy, information and tools to facilitate effective partnerships.
What might a 2026 dance policy look like?
Well, that’s what I’m going to propose at the end of this document. But, I’m only going to use the words and phrases published by ACE, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and other governmental departments in their reports and on their websites from the last 30 years. What ACE published in 2006 wasn’t really a policy, it was a mixture of brief situational analysis, a vision, some desires, a recommendation or two and a conclusion - so I’ll do the same.
I want to demonstrate a pathway of narrative excellence and highlight some of the key dance reports and publications from that period in an attempt to create a policy which uses the literature and language that has already been produced. Think of it as maybe something AI could do if it cared about history, dance and ACE, but it’s an IA instead. No hallucinations, no LLM and no negative ecological impact. As Theodore Roosevelt said: “A nation’s greatness lies in its possibility of achievement in the present, and nothing helps it more than the consciousness of achievement in the past.” To many, the past is a foreign country, but if those 2026 advisory panel members and others who might be deciding a future framework of what will be funded in dance by ACE are not aware of what has already been published, tried, succeeded or failed - then are we setting ourselves up for a narrative of future failure by not learning from or at least knowing our past?
But let’s get back to The Rt. Hon. and Very Excellent Margaret Hodge MP who was Minister of State for Culture and Tourism from 2007 until Labour was defeated at the 2010 general election. During that time the DCMS commissioned Sir Brian McMaster to write Supporting Excellence in the Arts From Measurement to Judgement, a 31 page report extolling the virtues of the pursuit of greatness in the arts. Who was the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport that made that original invitation to Sir Brian? James Purnell. Guess who’s back?
Margaret Hodge at Demos: Culture and the Arts - The Next Decade which marked the launch of a new, year-long Policy Fellowship. Published on YouTube by DemosTV, March 2010.
One of the pieces of research I conducted for this text was the frequency of use of the word “excellence” in each ACE Annual Report published from 1997 - 2026. There was a definite boomtime from 2009-2012 which was influenced by Hodge, Purnell and the McMaster report.
1997 - 0
1998 - 1
1999 - 2
2001 - 1
2002 - 1
2003 - 2
2004 - 2
2005 - 2
2006 - 3
2007 - 5
2008 - 8
2009 - 18
2010 - 33
2011 - 24
2012 - 16
2013 - 9
2014 - 19
2015 - 7
2016 - 16
2017 - 11
2018 - 13
2019 - 9
2020 - 8
2021 - 2
2022 - 1
2023 - 5
2024 - 6
2025 - 7
2026 - 7
How many times was “Excellence” used in the 2026 Hodge Review? 28. Back again.

Photo of the top 30 rows of Arts Council England Archive: ACE Publications. Published by ACE in February 2018.
The Dictionary.com definition of excellence is: “the state or quality of excelling or being exceptionally good; extreme merit; superiority; an action, characteristic, feature, etc, in which a person excels.” What befuddles me with Baroness Hodge and the simplistic waving of her wand of excellence is that excellence simply cannot exist everywhere for everyone all at once. If everything is excellent and everyone is excellent then nothing and no-one is excellent. Nothing is standing out and no one is excelling in comparison to someone else.
Perceived notions of excellence are often tied to the amount of resources someone has access to and what access they have to established corridors of power and personal relationships to leverage more opportunities. Hodge talks about excellence like she thinks dance and the arts are a meritocracy in England, and if you’re good enough you’ll make it. Has anyone introduced her to structural barriers? 1000s of dance workers encounter invisible brick walls every day because of their class, ableist projections, unspoken racist agendas and blatant misogyny. The field is not and never will be level. If ACE had an ethical desire and wanted to position what it’s doing with dance in England differently, they’d take equity as their core value and invest their money accordingly for the next 25 years.
The work that Akram Khan Company makes is not excellent. The work that Company Wayne McGregor makes is not excellent. The work that Hofesh Shechter Company makes is not excellent. The list could go on. Polished? Yes. Large scale? Yes. But they have all had significant access to resources and established corridors of power for decades and we all know how the concentration of power works. They are not exceptional, they are just the ones who were chosen. The excellence narrative around dance in England would have been very different if three other people were chosen at the beginning of the 21st century.
As an organisation ACE have made it quite difficult to source some of their historical data, publications and reports. I don’t know if this is to obscure their past and ensure it’s easier to forget things or if it’s because they have to consistently trim their own internal workforce and archiving and knowledge protection have been sacrificed at the altar of financial shavings.
They used to publish an Excel spreadsheet which listed all of their publications, but the last one I have access to was updated in February 2018 and it listed 1790 documents with the earliest one published in 1946, which was their first annual report when they were the Arts Council of Great Britain. What you have now is this research library which has 114 documents and this, which has 184. History is erased.
Talking of history. Arts 4 Everyone was a funding programme launched by “The Arts Council of England” in 1996 and this is how they described it:
“People with new creative arts projects can apply for cash from the National Lottery under the new scheme, Arts 4 Everyone (A4E), which was launched on 21 November 1996 by the Arts Council of England. Lottery funding which was previously only available for capital projects such as buildings, equipment and film, is now also available for funding new projects arts activities.
The scheme is designed to develop:
new audiences
participation in the arts
new work
young people's talent
training or professional development.”
At the launch of A4E at the Donmar Warehouse, actor Tony Robinson said: "The A4E programme will give great opportunities to all those small groups around the country who are being so creative. They probably will have never thought that they would be able to get any funding for it. In fact, half of them have probably never even heard of the Arts Council!"
Grants of between £500 and £500,000 were available to established and newly formed organisations to provide new opportunities for funding for new arts activity and new audiences. The Arts Council were keen to help voluntary and amateur organisations that they hadn't been able to fund before. Deadlines were 28 November 1997 and 31 March 1998. A4E Express was a pilot scheme which ran for 9 months in 1997, but it ended. It gave grants of up to £5,000 and according to Graham Hitchens:
“The results were remarkable, as captured in an independent evaluation of the programme commissioned by the Arts Council in 1997:
-
£21m was allocated to 5,000 organisations over two rounds of funding
-
An estimated 240,000 artists or performers were involved in activities which achieved audiences of 5 million people – reaching many parts of the country which had not previously benefited from Lottery funding
-
80% of applicants felt that the application form was simple to understand,
-
Administration costs were around 2% of the overall funding allocated
-
The programme was actively supported by artists, community groups, regional and other bodies
-
99% of local authorities consulted wanted the scheme to continue.
But it wasn’t. By the Summer of 1997 A4E Express had been scrapped. The main reason cited for not continuing with the scheme was the cost – not the cost of running it, but the cost of its popularity and effectiveness: it was simply too successful at distributing funds in the way that it was originally intended (“more young people”; “more participation” etc.) and it risked diverting funds away from that part of the programme which was targeting the RFOs. £5m had been set aside for the A4E Express scheme targeting youth and community participation; but, after two rounds of funding, more than £20m was spent on projects which met all the Express criteria. Groups from around the country were putting together applications for a range of creative and innovative projects involving an extraordinary number and diversity of artists and audiences. And just 2% spent on administration? That’s a pretty impressive figure for a scheme which was giving out grants of £5000 or less.”

I know the 1990s are back and things go in 30 year cycles, but could you imagine if this was to be available now? £5000 in 1997 equates to £11,800 now. If the job of ACE, as it states in their Royal Charter, is to:
-
i. develop and improve the knowledge, understanding and practice of the arts;
-
ii. increase accessibility of the arts to the public in England;
-
iii. advance the education of the public; and to further any other charitable purpose which relates:
-
to the establishment, maintenance and operation of museums and libraries (which are either public or from which the public may benefit); and to
-
the protection of cultural property.
-
You’ve already developed a very good administrative model of getting lots of small amounts of money to communities quickly with very limited administrative burden and people wanted it to continue.
Photo of Akram Khan and Sidi Larbi Cherkaoui in Zero Degrees (2005) by Tristam Kenton - taken from Dance Mapping Executive Summary - A Window on Dance 2004 - 2008, published by Arts Council England
Hitchens goes on to say:
“A4E Express took decision-making away from the Arts Council art form departments (and, indeed, the Regional Arts Boards). While, of course, art form departments were happy to support objectives aimed at increasing ‘participation’ by young people and others, and expanding audiences – a programme in which the arts activity was defined by the bidder, and in which endorsements were provided by local arts advisers, was deemed inappropriate for a national arts agency.”
Does any of this sound familiar? “A set of decisions built on artform expertise and the views of local citizens.” Or “We will also ensure that the views of local citizens are embedded in our decision-making.”
Excellence is everywhere within government (the Research Excellence Framework in Higher Education, the NHS Excellence Awards, The Defence Technical Excellence Colleges and we even have Excellent Science Advice) and it osmotically seeps out into the arms length organisations and workers to put it into play. In March 2016, the Department of Education published Educational Excellence Everywhere and there’s a lot in here that could (and might have already been) be transposed into an arts and culture narrative that is already slowly reshaping the incoming excellent structures of thought.
There’s only one piece of evidence that I’ve found concerning how ACE defined and measured excellence, and that came in their 2010/11 Annual Report. The same year they published their 10 year strategic framework - Achieving Great Art For Everyone - and it comes down to how RFO’s (now NPO’s) were assessed in their annual reviews and whether they ‘met strong’ or ‘met outstanding’ between 2006/07 and 2009/10:
“Excellence - Artistic Quality*
An increase in the percentage of regularly funded organisations that are assessed as ‘met strong’ or ‘met outstanding’ in artistic quality following their annual reviews
Baseline - 2006/07
62.3% of regularly funded organisations in our portfolio were assessed as ‘met strong’ or ‘met outstanding’
Actual - 2009/10
70.0% of regularly funded organisations in our portfolio were assessed as ‘met strong’ or ‘met outstanding’. This represents an increase of 7.7% against the baseline
Source: 2006/07 and 2009/10 annual assessments of regularly funded organisations
*Please note that for 2009/10 annual reviews, the rating was changed to ‘excellence and innovation’, which is comparable with ‘artistic quality’
High Quality Arts Experiences
An increase in the percentage of people who rate their last arts experience as being of ‘high quality’
Baseline - 2007/08
57.1% of people rated their last arts experience as being of ‘high quality’
Actual - 2009/10
59.2% of people rated their last arts experience as being of ‘high quality’
Source: Taking Part survey 2007/08 and 2009/10”
20 years ago in August 2006, ACE published two information sheets; 1) How we assess artistic quality and 2) Arts report form guidance. Whilst neither of these documents mention excellence, they attempt to give some language explaining how they make decisions on artistic quality. Their approach considered three dimensions of an artistic work:
-
idea – the concept or artistic impetus behind the work
-
practice – the effectiveness of how the work is put into practice and the impact it has on those experiencing it
-
development – the contribution the work makes to the development of the artist, the artform and the arts more widely
Is excellence the same as artistic quality? Is that really what ACE are saying?
Who are the people deemed excellent enough or of suitable artistic quality by Cate Caniffe, ACE - Director Dance and London (who used to be a Producer for Rafael Bonachela before undertaking this role at ACE in 2013) to be invited to be on the dance Sector Advisory Panel in 2026?
Martin Wilson, Tin Arts
Sharon Watson, Northern School of Contemporary Dance
David Collins, Northern Ballet
Robby Graham, Southpaw Dance
Anand Bhatt, Birmingham Hippodrome
Louise Katarega, Freelancer
Laura Nicholson, One Dance UK
Ashley Jordan, Freelancer
Michael Ockwell, Southampton Mayflower
Rosalind Conlon, Freelancer
Zoie Golding, ZoieLogic Dance Theatre
Anthony Missen, DanceEast
Claire Thompson, Oxford City Council
Urja Desi-Thakore, Pagrav Dance Company
Lucy Glover, StopGap Dance
Lee Griffiths, Freelancer
Cassa Pancho, Ballet Black
Ginny Brown, Imperial Society of Teachers of Dancing
Subathra Subramaniam, Akademi
Sir Alistair Spalding, Sadlers Wells
The only name carried over from the 2001 group is one [Sir] Alistair Spalding who has led that organisation for nearly 22 years and published this horrificly excellent aura farming post in June 2026 on Instagram. It shook me.


L- Photo of Eric Underwood in Chroma by Wayne McGregor for The Royal Ballet taken by Johan Persson.
R - Photo of Fernanda Prata and Leon Baugh in Park by Jasmin Vardimon Company taken by Gavin Parry.
Both taken from Dance Mapping Executive Summary - A Window on Dance 2004 - 2008, published by Arts Council England, 2009
Before we get into the excellent dialogue of ACE, DCMS and the government talking to itself, here are 11 documents that tell a story of dance in England since 2001 or how Baroness Margaret Hodge came to love excellence (again).
21st Century Dance (70 pages)
Jeanette Siddall / Arts Council England, May 2001
Arts Council England: Submission to the Culture Media and Sport Committee - Inquiry into Dance (17 pages)
Arts Council England, May 2004
House of Commons - Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Arts Development: Dance, Sixth Report of Session 2003–04 Volume I (50 pages)
House of Commons, June 2004
Dance Policy (12 pages)
Arts Council England, November 2006
Supporting Excellence in the Arts From Measurement to Judgement (31 pages)
Sir Brian McMaster, DCMS, January 2008
Dance Mapping: A Window on Dance 2004 - 2008 (380 pages)
Susanne Burns and Sue Harrison / Arts Council England, October 2009
Joining up the dots: Dance agencies – thoughts on future direction. A companion report to Dance Mapping: a window on dance
Susanne Burns and Sue Harrison (unattributed) / Arts Council England, April 2010
Achieving Great Art For Everyone: A Strategic Framework for the Arts (27 pages)
Arts Council England, November 2010
Ambition for Excellence Evaluation Report (77 pages)
In2Impact / Arts Council England, August 2022
Arts Council England - an independent review by Baroness Margaret Hodge
Baroness Margaret Hodge, DCMS, March 2026
Independent Review of Arts Council England: Our Response (25 pages)
Arts Council England, July 2026

Photo of a headline and subheading of an article by Judith Mackrell - published by The Guardian in April 2015.
The Narrative of Excellence, History and Dance - A Very English Chronology
“The defined purpose of the Arts Council of Great Britain is to maintain the highest possible standard in the arts. When Lord Keynes met the press, on the day that the future was announced, he told them that no big changes would take place and that the Council's established purpose held good: to encourage the best British national arts, everywhere, and to do it as far as possible by supporting others rather than by setting up state-run enterprises. The artist walks where the breath of the spirit blows him. He cannot be told his direction; he does not know it himself. But he leads the rest of us into fresh pastures and teaches us to love and to enjoy what we often begin by rejecting, enlarging our sensibility and purifying our instincts. The task of an official body is not to teach or to censor, but to give courage, confidence and opportunity." [1]
Unattributed, The Arts Council of Great Britain - 1946
“The famous "arm's length" principle is as robust and as essential as ever, and it has been re-affirmed recently by the Secretary of State in the Commons. Funding for the arts has steadily increased over the past five years but it is now threatened by an attack of traditional Treasury pecksniffery which affects understanding of the arts but ignores the crucial fact that artistic talent is a resource so precious that it is not easily subject to regulation by parsimony. There is all the difference between the prudent disposition and management of scarce resources and the denial of them as an article of dogmatic frugality as a necessary antidote to the proven success of the arts in this country over the past few years.” [2]
Lord Palumbo, Chairman, Arts Council of Great Britain - 1993
“We believe that it is very important for the Government to set out a clear, overarching policy for dance, writing down the implicit objectives which the Arts Minister seemingly devised in preparation for oral evidence to us. These were: excellence, access and contribution to healthy living. It is very important that the profile of dance, and its potential to contribute to different policy areas, is raised throughout Government and beyond. Rt Hon Estelle Morris, the Minister for the Arts, DCMS, outlined for the Committee, the Government’s policy on dance: “The Government’s policy I think is three-fold. Firstly, to cherish excellence and to make sure as a nation that we maintain our record and our reputation of having excellent dance companies. I suppose in shorthand you might say that is the art, excellence, to make sure we support what is there. Secondly, I think our job is to work with the Department for Education and Skills in particular, and other organisations, to make sure that everybody has access to dance from that very first experience, making sure that every child at some point during their school years or their early years experiences dance, and making sure that for those who want to there is a pathway through. Whether that pathway leads to the excellence end of the scale or whether it just leads to adulthood where they continue to do dance is up to them. Thirdly, I think this is increasingly something that we are talking about in the Department, to work with a range of departments across Whitehall to maximise the contribution of dance to healthy living. I see those three areas – excellence, access and the contribution to healthy living – as I suppose the three–pronged approach that Government has to dance.
In oral evidence, we discussed with the Minister for the Arts the Government’s strategy for dance and she told us: “I see those three areas - excellence, access and the contribution to healthy living - as I suppose the three–pronged approach that Government has to dance. Having said that, I did enquire, and Government does not as such have a written policy on dance. It is not something that it has done a policy statement on or has featured grandly in either manifestos or department policy strategies but of course the Arts Council does have a policy on dance and I suppose that is where the action is taking place at the moment. We believe that the Government should have a specific policy for dance which should build on this three-pronged approach - excellence, access and contribution to healthy living. We believe that it is the role of ACE to have a strategy (although not written at present) for dance in regard to excellence and development of the art form.” [3]
Unattributed, House of Commons Culture Media and Sport Committee - Arts Development: Dance - 2004
“We are prepared to make choices – sometimes tough ones – about how we commit our funding to respond to the kind of ambitious thinking and high quality work that will take our priorities forward. We believe they will help us develop a confident, diverse and innovative dance sector that is valued by and in tune with the communities it serves. We want dance in this country to maintain and develop its international reputation. For this to happen, artists must continue to have the opportunity to push the boundaries of the artform and produce work of the highest quality. The creativity and diversity of artists working in this country, our infrastructure for education, participation and professional training, the developments in dance and the moving image, and our support for artistic development set a world standard. Dance performance and participation celebrate our capacity to communicate through movement. They offer new ways of understanding our world and our humanity. There are a number of ways in which dance can be developed and distributed to ensure it reaches a wider audience. We would like to see more collaborations between producers, promoters and dance artists and a stronger touring infrastructure for live dance, with consortia of presenting venues and theatres commissioning new dance works.” [4]
Unattributed, Arts Council England - 2006
“Artistic quality is one of five criteria that we use in assessing applications to Grants for the arts and reviewing regularly funded organisations. It is central to our responsibility for public funding and our role as an arts development agency. Everyone experiences artistic work in their own way, and everyone’s experience is valid. People respond to artistic experiences differently too. We may be inspired, thrilled or challenged by the experience; we may respond emotionally, intellectually, physically or spiritually. The capacity to engage us directly and in different ways is one of the strengths of the arts, one of the ways in which the arts can change the lives of individuals and communities. It can also make artistic quality difficult to talk about and define. [5]
Unattributed, Arts Council England - 2006
“Our policy summarises the context for dance and the Arts Council’s role. It sets out our vision for dance and the priorities we have set to help us deliver it. Our ambition is for more people of all ages to enjoy and take part in dance that challenges, provokes, entertains and inspires them. Artform definition. Dance plays a key part in contemporary culture and is a popular social activity. Its impact is visual, kinaesthetic, intellectual and emotional. Artistically dance has grown and expanded into a myriad of styles and formats since the 1970s. Today, England has a leading reputation for diversity, support for artistic development, and education and training in dance. Screen dance offers new creative challenges and collaborations for artists and new means of engaging with dance for audiences. As creative practice, performance and participatory activity, dance engages all sectors of the population in theatres, dance houses, schools, arts centres, public spaces, and digitally, on film and television. Most dance tours across the country.” [6]
Unattributed, Arts Council England - 2007
“The time has come to reclaim the word ‘excellence’ from its historic, elitist undertones and to recognise that the very best art and culture is for everyone; that it has the power to change people’s lives, regardless of class, education or ethnicity. It is also time to trust our artists and our organisations to do what they do best - to create the most excellent work they can - and to strive for what is new and exciting, rather than what is safe and comfortable. To do this we must free artists and cultural organisations from outdated structures and burdensome targets, which can act as millstones around the neck of creativity.” [7]
James Purnell, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport - 2008
“The best definition of excellence I have heard is that excellence in culture occurs when an experience affects and changes an individual. An excellent cultural experience goes to the root of living. There is also an important difference between what I define as excellence and what I would call good practice. Excellence is about experience and good practice is what leads to it. There can be no doubting the value of excellent administration, financial management and research; all of these are factors that contribute to excellence of experience. Good practice alone, however, is not what I mean by excellence. The notion that the arts are not for everyone must be tackled head-on, since excellent art is by definition for, and relevant to, absolutely everyone.” [8]
Sir Brian McMaster, Author of Supporting Excellence in the Arts - 2008
“In this country an increasing number of people lead sedentary lifestyles and rates of obesity are rising. The need to improve levels of physical activity and develop healthier lifestyles has never been more pressing. The government has provided leadership and guidance on making healthier choices in the documents Choosing Health: Making Healthier Choices Easier and Choosing Activity: A Physical Activity Plan, but to improve their health and well-being, people need a range of suitable options. Dance can have a powerful effect on people’s lives - anyone can dance and enjoy dancing - and we want to see the physical, emotional, mental and social benefits of dance extended to as many people as possible.” [9]
David Lammy MP Minister for Culture and Caroline Flint MP Minister for Public Health - 2008
“The beginning of 2008 was not a good year for the Arts Council. The Investment Strategy review undertaken in 2007/08 led to an outcry within the sector and the new Chief Executive of Arts Council England, Alan Davey responded by commissioning a review by Baroness McIntosh. This was published in July 2008 along with the Arts Council’s response to the review. Following this Arts Council England published a new three-year plan, embarked on the development of a peer review process and an organisational review. This context provided the background for a speech from Alan Davey in November 2008 at the Royal Society of Arts. He stated: ‘My starting point tonight is a belief that if we get it right we can enter a new era in which artistic excellence, risk and innovation are at the heart of what we do in the arts in England. This will be linked to a new sense of ambition as to how we engage audiences and deepen their understanding and ability to respond to the work produced. But at the same time I also believe that achieving this change will require courage - from the Arts Council, from those artists and arts organisations we fund, and from those who fund us. The Arts Council must make difficult, contested decisions, and stick with the decisions it makes - really supporting risk and innovation. Those funded must develop a new honesty and frankness about what they do - some may find this uncomfortable.” [10]
Alan Davey, CEO, Arts Council England - 2008
“Excellence in Dance. A debate on excellence in the publicly funded arts sector became a major focus for the DCMS in 2007. It was to be a move away from the instrumental use of dance and was originally raised in a paper by the then Secretary of State, Tessa Jowell. James Purnell, the next Secretary of State continued this shift of emphasis by the government. Sir Brian McMaster was invited by him to consider how public subsidy can best support ‘excellence’ in the arts. The Arts Council England Dance Conversations referred to above provided a useful forum for sharing the thinking behind the McMaster report. Alistair Spalding of Sadler’s Wells and Stella Hall from Culture 10, Newcastle Gateshead, both spoke at separate conversations about excellence.
Alistair Spalding spoke of Sadler’s Wells’ own conversations with leading artists; these are broadcast on screens in the theatre’s circulation spaces and on the website and the Sadler’s Wells player. He spoke eloquently about an interview with Bill Forsythe, the American choreographer. He said that Bill spoke about perfection rather than excellence, acknowledging how much of himself goes into the making of a work seeking that perfection. Stella Hall talked about the qualities of excellence which included; rising above the ordinary, tenacity, flexibility, wide-ranging experiences, trying new things, fearlessness, openness to failure, good models of feedback that inspire you to go further and try again, identifying weakness and building on failure. She felt that excellence was not unplanned and that it was important to risk failure and then move on.
The Arts Council England published its measures for quality and how it was applied to the arts some time ago [2006] via an internal information sheet - Assessing Artistic Quality. It says: "Our approach is to consider three dimensions of artistic work:
• idea - the concept or artistic impetus behind the work
• practice - the effectiveness of how the work is put into practice and the impact it has on those experiencing it
• development - the contribution the work makes to the development of the artist, the artform and the arts more widely
This approach gives us a framework for describing artistic quality and we use it, described in different ways, when assessing regularly funded organisations and all applications for Grants for the Arts."
There is a need for wider debate around dance aesthetics and different genres of dance in order to further develop excellence, innovation and diversity through bringing together choreographers, producers and dancers to reflect on their practice.” [11]
Susanne Burns and Sue Harrison / Arts Council England - 2009
“People often ask what Arts Council England means by excellence. It is a tricky word, lazily taken for granted by some, suspected by others as carrying connotations of class or conventional culture, contentious, politically loaded and capable of starting fights. However, it is the star we steer by so we need to explain what we, at least, understand by the idea. Everyone will have their own sense of what excellence is, but for us it is simply the bravest, most original, most innovative, most perfectly realised work of which people are capable - whether in the creation of art, its performance, its communication or its impact on audiences. We cannot expect excellence every day from everyone, but we can insist on the aspiration towards it. And the Arts Council’s job is to recognise it, support it, nurture it and protect its freedom to be itself as far as we possibly can. The Arts Council is not an academy. It is an organisation whose duty is to engage with living artists and audiences, to encourage and inspire to ever-greater ambition and boldness. And excellence, in its most creative sense, is at the heart of our vision for the arts that we support. To be relevant in the 21st century, any definition of excellence has to find room for participation in art, as well as the classical notion of creation. But art, like excellence, will always elude neat definition. We must be as clear as we can and then acknowledge that it simply has mysterious aspects that are immensely powerful and can never be anticipated or accounted for.” [12]
Dame Liz Forgan, Chair, Arts Council England - 2010
“Some young and already great choreographers such as Hofesh Shechter and Akram Khan are producing work that really does get to the heart of humanity. In 2010 we have the conditions for excellence in the arts in this country that are quite simply working. We want to keep this golden age alive, for the long-term good of the arts themselves, for their place in society, and simply for the fact they make this nation rich in intellectual, spiritual and economic terms. We hope the ambition set out here matches that of the arts leaders, artists and audiences we have been talking to. It begins with excellence, because without that what we do does not work.” [13]
Alan Davey, Chief Executive, Arts Council England - 2010
“Goal 1: Talent and artistic excellence are thriving and celebrated. The excellence and innovation of some British community and education work is internationally recognised. This was considered to be an under-resourced area of work, both in import and export. Risk-taking and innovation is high on the agenda for many [National Dance] agencies who feel that providing research and development is a vital area of what an agency should be doing. Agencies feel it is their responsibility to improve the quality of choreography and dance practice. Agencies felt that they should be providing better support to emerging artists if they are going to successfully develop world-class choreographers and dancers. Some agencies have been designated as centres for advanced training, (CATs) through partnering with the Department for Children, Schools and Families to be part of the national strategy towards excellence for music and dance. The centres were welcomed although it was felt that they should establish a better shared approach to widening access and continue to offer culturally diverse dance training.” [14]
Susanne Burns and Sue Harrison (unattributed) / Arts Council England - 2010
“Our guiding principle in making judgements across this spectrum is to look for excellence: how original, innovative and artistically ambitious is the work, project, or event? Does it, in some way, have the ability or potential to change how the audience or participants view the world? While the definition of excellence is rightly a matter of continuous debate, we will confidently shape that debate. Our investment will favour art that is both artistically excellent and inspiring to audiences. Our commitment to excellence demands a commitment to diversity in the arts. We know that the arts we currently support are not as diverse as they could or should be. There are still barriers in the arts world that mean that the potential for great art to be produced and enjoyed remains unrealised. We are becoming clearer about how the country’s artistic excellence is reliant on, and benefits from, the richness and innovation that diversity brings. Our vision is of England as a world-leading creative and cultural nation. In 2021 the arts are thriving. They are internationally renowned for excellence – diverse new work is being created, art forms are evolving, and artists can develop their talent. Great art inspires; it encourages people to value the arts. Without a dedicated pursuit of excellence, the achievements of artists and arts organisations would diminish and audiences would suffer. Excellence does not just happen. It requires a concerted effort to nurture talented artists from the earliest years. We want to establish England as a pre-eminent world centre for artistic excellence. This means a vigorous commitment to enabling artists to take risks and change direction. It means encouraging excellence in all its forms and defending and celebrating freedom of expression.” [15]
Unattributed, Arts Council England - 2011
“Ambition for Excellence (AfE) is an Arts Council England fund that aimed to stimulate and support excellence across the arts sector in England. The AfE fund opened for applications in May 2015 with the final awards being made in February 2018. Arts Council England invested £35.2m into the programme, funding a total of 67 projects led by 66 organisations (The Young Vic in London had two funded projects). The specific formal aims of the Ambition for Excellence programme were to:
-
Contribute to the development of strong cultural places,
-
Grow and develop talent and leadership in the regions and across artforms,
-
Create the highest quality new work, including for outdoor and festival contexts,
-
Give an international dimension to excellent work
The Programme focused on the funding of creative and development opportunities for large-scale projects that could support a step change in practice both within and beyond the funded organisations. The aims of AfE were very well aligned to those of Let’s Create, the new Arts Council England strategy for 2020-2030. For many grantee organisations, Let’s Create provides a new framework within which to build on the platform provided by Ambition for Excellence.” [16]
In2Impact / Arts Council England - 2022
“ACE should replace Let’s Create with a new, less prescriptive strategy that is both ambitious, simple and reflects the government’s ambition of excellence for all but that allows each organisation or individual to apply according to their strengths and the unique contribution they can make to delivering a vibrant and innovative creative sector that is consistent with the overarching strategy of the Arts Council. Access to artistic excellence should not be consigned to the privileged few, and a national Arts Council, free from political interference, is the best way to ensure that these benefits are realised across the country and by all the communities within it. Excellence and access to excellence were two principles that underpinned Jennie Lee’s view of the arts. Though ‘ambition and quality’ are a core investment principle in Let’s Create, ACE’s current approach was seen as interpreting this in a way that fails to give proper value to artistic excellence and does not enable access by all communities to excellence. Of course ACE needs a strategy to inform its work, but a strategy should first and foremost facilitate artistic excellence as well as access to excellence. It must have a simple set of guiding principles that can be applied to support innovation and risk taking. To address the challenges we have identified, this paper sets out a suggested way to both strengthen national decision-making whilst also strengthening the regional voice in decision-making and ensuring that artistic excellence is properly balanced with other outcomes. If we really do want to ensure more and more communities access excellence, we have to rescue touring. The challenge for the Arts Council is to achieve both excellence and participation together.” [17]
Baroness Margaret Hodge - 2026
“As we look to the challenges that lie ahead, one thing is clear. For the good of all, cultural organisations and artists must continue to achieve excellence in their work: both in creating, inspiring, and pushing boundaries, and in reaching more people in more places. You will see: A simpler, more streamlined framework that supports the ambitions of our artists and creative professionals, and allows their unique strengths to shine through. It will confirm that excellence matters, and will commit us to working to ensure all communities have access to high quality cultural experiences and opportunities to develop their creative potential. Currently, we provide multi-year funding to a country-wide network of close to 1000 organisations via our National Portfolio Investment Programme. This is the most consequential investment the Arts Council makes. These organisations are at the centre of our national cultural life: they are committed to excellence and innovation in their creative and cultural practice; they are one of the country’s key employers of creative professionals, both as full-time members of staff and as freelancers; they develop new talent; they champion artistic freedom; they play a critical role in the commercial creative ecology; and they bring entertainment, inspiration and joy to millions every year.
We will continue to involve those we work with in key stages of the design process for the next National Portfolio, to ensure that the programme we develop puts them first, removes barriers, gives them scope to demonstrate the excellence and individuality of their contribution, and ultimately supports us to make the best possible decisions. This new framework will draw on the values of equality and diversity that underpin our current strategy, and which were endorsed by the Independent Review. It will confirm that excellence matters, and it will centre the distinctive creative and cultural practices of the artforms, museums and libraries that we support, so that everyone applying to us can see themselves clearly in our aims. The steps we have set out – rooted in service design, driven by evidence, and guided by artform expertise – will reduce burdens, unlock opportunities, and strengthen the resilience and reach of England’s cultural ecology. Working with our partners across the country, we will deliver tangible improvements that protect artistic freedom, nurture and celebrate excellence, widen access, and give citizens more power to shape how we invest in their communities.” [18]
Darren Henley, CEO, Arts Council England - 2026
“Access to arts and culture is not a luxury - it is a necessity. It shapes our communities and enriches our lives. This government believes that excellence must be open to everyone, wherever they live and whatever their background. A national Arts Council, connected to the places and people it serves, is essential to making that vision a reality.” [19]
Lisa Nandy, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport - 2026

Page 1/6 of Appendix 4 from the Dance Mapping: A Window on Dance 2004 - 2008 report, published by ACE in October 2009
A Dance Policy for England in 2026
Using the words and phrases published by ACE, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and other governmental departments in their reports and on their websites from the last 30 years.
Introduction
“The time has come to reclaim the word ‘excellence’ from its historic, elitist undertones and to recognise that the very best art and culture is for everyone; that it has the power to change people’s lives, regardless of class, education or ethnicity. It is also time to trust our artists and our organisations to do what they do best - to create the most excellent work they can - and to strive for what is new and exciting, rather than what is safe and comfortable.” Purnell, 2009
“Dance is achieving much, but too quietly. It has not yet reached the critical mass or profile that will ensure it is always on the agenda beyond the arts community. Public perception and understanding about dance needs to be raised, broadened and brought up to date. Its significant contribution to areas such as health, education and social regeneration, as much as to excellent and innovatory art, are all stories waiting to be told. Bold artistic statements, risk and challenge will engage people in talking about artistic issues and make dance relevant to their everyday lives.” Siddall, 2001
“There is a need for wider debate around dance aesthetics and different genres of dance in order to further develop excellence, innovation and diversity through bringing together choreographers, producers and dancers to reflect on their practice. It is possible that key stakeholders are unintentionally creating a landscape that limits the expression and development of dance by constraining the debate to what is funded rather than the larger context and bigger map of the field.” Burns and Harrison, 2009
“Excellence and access to excellence were two principles that underpinned Jennie Lee’s view of the arts. Access to artistic excellence should not be consigned to the privileged few, and a national Arts Council, free from political interference, is the best way to ensure that these benefits are realised across the country and by all the communities within it. If we really do want to ensure more and more communities access excellence, we have to rescue touring.” Hodge, 2026
Priorities
“The narrative is clear with government policy recognising both the intrinsic and extrinsic importance of dance as a unique artform. The DCMS responded by identifying three priorities for dance:
1) Supporting the artform - supporting the development of dance as an artform - its artists, infrastructure, buildings, companies - and so maintain our pre-eminent status in dance.
2) Developing pathways - building pathways in dance, so that all young people can experience dance for the first time and extend their involvement to a level that suits them.
3) Healthy living - maximise the contribution that dance can make to encouraging everyone of any age to exercise and live a healthier life.” Burns and Harrison, 2009
Our Why
“We will support the development of dance in order to achieve our ambition of putting the arts at the heart of national life and people at the heart of the arts. This means enabling artists and arts organisations to take creative risks and pursue new opportunities. Our policy summarises the context for dance and the Arts Council’s role. It sets out our vision for dance and the priorities we have set to help us deliver it. Today’s dance artists draw on influences from around the world: from hip hop to Kathak; from salsa to ballet. London has long been a major international dance capital and continues to be home to the majority of the artists and companies that work nationally and internationally. Cities such as Birmingham and Leeds are hubs of dance activity and there is a growing appetite for dance in towns and rural areas across the country.
Demand is outstripping supply for teachers, managers and leaders. There is more work to do to match demand with the skills and aspirations of dance professionals and to create an environment where a life-long career in dance is viable. Young people have more opportunities to experience dance and new kinds of support for identifying and nurturing talent are being established. Tomorrow’s dance artists, audiences and policy-makers will be increasingly diverse, discerning and demanding. Our vision for dance has to match the ambition of future generations.
We want dance in this country to maintain and develop its international reputation. For this to happen, artists must continue to have the opportunity to push the boundaries of the artform and produce work of the highest quality. There are a number of ways in which dance can be developed and distributed to ensure it reaches a wider audience. We would like to see more collaborations between producers, promoters and dance artists and a stronger touring infrastructure for live dance, with consortia of presenting venues and theatres commissioning new dance works.” Unattributed, 2006
“Access to dance performances across the country is provided by touring companies. There are a number of key promoters who programme dance with energy and commitment, however a strong national network still needs to be consolidated. Too often dance companies expend a disproportionate amount of time, energy and resources in developing audiences for short runs. This is particularly onerous at the middle scale where management resources are leanest and touring dates are frequently for one or two nights.
Contemporary dance tends to be created for the middle and small scale, but is frequently still perceived as ‘high risk’ by venue managers. Most bookings on these scales are for one or two nights, so touring costs are high. Audience development and marketing initiatives are cost and labour intensive, with limited opportunities for word-of-mouth and press coverage to impact on audience numbers. Frequently dance is booked only two or three times in a year, or as part of a dance week or at times when both little other product and limited audiences are available.
The small scale finds a log-jam of new and emerging dance artists, a mixture of future stars and work that has not yet found the imagination, production values or artistic power to win significant audiences. It provides the essential testing ground, but needs a better sifting system to really contribute to audience development.” Siddall, 2001
Programme Recommendations
“Investing in Individuals - the dance artists fellowship programme should be continued and developed into a rolling programme, open to dancers as well as choreographers. The programme offers time for artistic growth, artist-driven working practices and most significantly it is investing in tomorrow's creative and interpretative artists. The pilot programme, operating in 2000-02, supports seven artists and has been welcomed by the sector. The programme focuses on developing the artist’s individual voice, strengthening confidence and prompting bold, risky steps forward.
Strengthening Companies - middle and larger small-scale companies are in crisis, and funds are needed urgently to save several from closure. Beyond this, enhanced production values and bigger casts will better meet audience and venue expectations, while different and more appropriate creation and dissemination practices will better support artistic achievement. Greater diversity needs to be encouraged among small and emerging companies. Talent must be backed, but not forced into a relentless cycle of making and touring work. Funds need to respond to artists’ self-determination and encourage them to enter the arts market with new, diverse and individual approaches to dance creation and dissemination.
Creating the Climate - cultural diversity needs special attention. Mainstream education, the vocational training infrastructure and creation and dissemination processes, are all based on western dance models. The issues relating to the still-developing critical mass for dance are even sharper for culturally diverse dance. Work has to be better supported, with enhanced management and marketing, and brought into the arts infrastructure at all levels. Opportunities for creative experimentation, networking, mentoring and debate are also needed.” Siddall, 2001
Dance Training - this scheme enables dance organisations to provide nationally strategic training opportunities for those involved professionally in dance. The wide range of activities includes, for example, choreographic research and mentoring schemes, critical debate, long-term development projects and international initiatives.
Promoter/Artists Collaborations - applications are invited from promoters and producers who wish to collaborate with an artist/company or group of artists/companies. This category includes a range of activities, for example, the commissioning of new work, the curation of programmes of work by a number of choreographers and specific artistic enhancements of festivals/seasons of work, particularly the programming of international work.
Making and Touring of Dance Works (including Revivals) - the main purpose of this fund is to support the touring of a range of high quality dance throughout England. This includes the production costs of new work and/or the costs of rehearsing or reworking existing pieces. A tour involves venues in at least three Regional Arts Board regions (including the host region)." [20] Unattributed, 1998
Data
“A ‘new deal for data’ would see the development of consistent data sets that are shared and readily available in order to allow the dance field to make a more robust case for dance. The development of a central repository of data on dance would be a significant step for the field and would allow the sharing of learning and non business sensitive data.” Burns and Harrison, 2009
Conclusion
“The vision for 21st century dance weaves together strengthened core support with shifts in approach - focused on individuals and companies, looking to the future and creating the climate in which dance can thrive. Dance in England has found new languages, forms, meanings and applications over the last four decades. Today the funded dance portfolio is diverse and eclectic, including performing companies, dance agencies providing promotion and space for creation, production and participation, and strategic development organisations. Access, education and new ways of engaging with audiences have been integral to this growth.
Life is changing, and unless we look to the future, we are in danger of proposing solutions for yesterday’s problems. Dance celebrates and is enriched by cultural diversity, yet a decade of decline in funding for vocational training has resulted in a student population that is predominantly white, middle-class and female. Much of the traditional culture of training and working practice encourages conformity rather than difference. Individuals will drive the major changes in dance, and the arts funding system's recent focus on individuals offers an opportunity to support individual vision, talent and drive. It is time to build in the capacity for dance to be future-ready, if not future-proof.
There is a wide range of choice for promoters, and a regular diet of international work is touring more widely. But under resourced theatres demand significant marketing and audience development support from even more stretched dance companies. This is particularly onerous on the smaller scales where management resources are leanest and budgets tightest. A number of these dance companies have been facing crises. There is a lack of balance in dance provision that needs to be addressed if the art form is to be sustained, nurtured and developed. On the large scale, the dance that reaches the largest audiences is predominantly balletic. New work is being created, but there is little evidence of new developments in the language of ballet.
Companies at all scales need to be strengthened, with backing directed at anticipating growth and releasing capacity. Seismic shifts could be initiated by creative coalitions between organisations, while the potential to back the unexpected needs to be built in. Companies and organisations that were emerging, artistically and managerially, at the start of the 1990s now have established artistic track records, organisational structures and national strategic roles. Artistically, the under-resourced independent sector is driving creativity and pushing the art form forwards, while the bulk of public subsidy is directed at a small number of large companies. A critical shortage of male dancers has followed years of underinvestment in dance in schools and vocational training provision. Recently, a production had to be cancelled when calls to 20 male dancers found that none were available for work. Too many of England’s key individuals and companies in dance are living an itinerant, hand-to-mouth existence that belies their true significance. The relentless drive to respond to crisis is cheating audiences and suppressing excellence, and it is taking its toll on artists and managers across dance.
Dance managers are increasingly being entrepreneurial, finding new contexts, relationships and ways of making best use of human and financial resources. This way of working brings its own stresses and anxieties. Most dance professionals are young, reflecting the rapid growth of activity, but increasingly the sector will need to be able to support senior professionals. Funding and support systems need to be people-focused, aim to protect against burn-out and promote the possibility of lifelong careers in dance.
International exchange is important to artistic development, and international touring contributes to the profile and self-esteem of dance artists. Promoting British dance overseas requires them to be more competitive when compared to highly subsidised native companies elsewhere. Greater effort needs to be put into international advocacy through networking, and attending conferences and seminars.
We need to recognise too that the world beyond dance works on words. While kinaesthetic images are powerful and pervasive, dance needs to be as articulate with words as it is through movement. Writing about dance has made academic advances, but reviews remain scarce and issue-based features even rarer. Few dance personalities feature as interesting media commentators, even on arts issues. To an extent this reflects the nature of dance, an apologetic culture and a still-developing critical mass. Stronger dialogue, debate, opinion, passion, conflict and spin, would engage the general public, vitalise the language of dance, raise its profile and open new access routes.
The prime purpose of the Arts Council's dance strategy over the last decade has been to create a healthy ecology for dance. English dance has an enviable reputation internationally for its cultural diversity, quality, creativity and the relative strength of its infrastructure. These are the rewards of three decades of investment of time and money, of evolving strategies and a dynamic partnership between artists and the arts funding system.” Siddall, 2001

Photo by Dawn Airey CBE - the newly appointed Chair of ACE who will start her four year term on 1 August 2026.
Post. Script.
Earlier in 2026, ACE circulated this draft document - Dance Matters Now Manifesto - internally via a number of NPOs for their comment and feedback. If this is what is on the table and if this is what is being re-drafted and tinkered with behind the behind the scenes (this is not a spelling mistake) outside of the aforementioned advisory group, then I am concerned. It’s conceptually everywhere, but clearly has no excellence. It reveals a startling shallowness of thought, offers little to galvanise a sector who already know and live this experience everyday and demonstrates a writing ability that is clearly inferior to all of these other documents referenced throughout this text.
If you want to achieve depth and genuinely want input from those who’re working in the field, you’re not going to get that from a series of 8 minute breakout Zoom rooms asking people to give feedback on a series of issues that you’ve already prescribed (my experience in an earlier ACE consultation that might be being repeated again).
Let’s see what the dance manifesto/overview/policy/AI burp will look like after it’s been co-created and choreographed, if it isn’t any different to what’s been proposed or written already (like this one from 2019 published by One Dance UK) then please wake me up in 2056 and whisper this quote from George Santayana to me: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
This text was published on 1st August 2026, the date when the new Chair of ACE - Dawn Airey CBE - started her four year term, so I'll leave the last excellent word to her: "I am honoured to have been appointed as the new Chair of Arts Council England as we champion artistic excellence and experience for all, wherever you live, whatever you do. This is your Arts Council and I am excited to be part of it."
References
[2] https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/The%20Arts%20Council%20of%20Great%20Britain%20-%2048th%20annual%20report%20and%20accounts%201992-93.pdf
[3] https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmcumeds/587/587.pdf
[4] https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Dance_mapping_full_report.pdf
[10] https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Dance_mapping_full_report.pdf
[11] https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Dance_mapping_full_report.pdf
[12] https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/media/20623/download?attachment
[13] https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/media/20623/download?attachment
[15] https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/media/20623/download?attachment
[16] https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/research-and-data/our-research/ambition-excellence
[18] https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/independent-review-full-response#download

